Archive for 2010

Electricity 2.0: Unlocking the Power of the Open Energy Network (OEN)

In a major new policy paper, Green Project Director Michael Moynihan argues that America must upgrade to Electricity 2.0, an open, distributed network, to unlock the potential of clean technology and unleash a renewable revolution.

Electricity 2.0 (pdf)

America and the world stand on the brink of a revolution. That revolution—in how the world creates, trades, and consumes energy—has the potential not only to aid the environment but also to lower the risk of war, create wealth, democratize energy, and empower people everywhere as never before. While this revolution is generally associated with the term ‘clean energy’, the issue is deeper: How to reinvent the energy network and democratize global energy.

Many fuel sources make up the world’s energy supply, but at its heart lies one network—the electricity network. Electricity forms the backbone of the world’s wider system of energy exchange because it is electricity that links other networks, such as oil shipments, gas pipelines, and coal trains. It is electricity that converts the energy captured in prehistoric plants, rushing rivers, and the atom into flowing electrons and enables that energy to move not at the speed of a tanker or truck but virtually instantaneously. It is thus unique in allowing falling water in one time zone, for example, to light up a city in another.

Like other networks—the telecom network, the network of roads and rails, and commercial networks—the electricity network or ‘grid’ creates value by linking people. However, heavily regulated, undersized, short on intelligence, and long on red tape, today’s grid has become a barrier to the clean and efficient flow of energy.

While the network has many physical deficits, its real problem is not physical at all. Its real problem is systemic: It is supported by a system that, rather than encouraging change and innovation actively thwarts them. Many problems afflict the current system, including bias against new clean technologies and renewable power. But all such problems share a common solution: Tear down the walls to the energy network.

To understand why progress in the United States has been so elusive, NDN and the New Policy Institute embarked upon an extensive study of the implementation of clean power and technology in America. Our findings suggest that the slow progress to date is not due to a lack of will or money but, rather, to a central and pervasive problem—the structure of the power industry in the United States.

Our research suggests that key structural roadblocks are blocking progress. These roadblocks stem from the extraordinarily complex structure of the American power industry, and they are blocking the uptake of clean technology and the deployment of renewable resources.

China’s Censorship and Information Freedom

The Chinese government has taken some umbrage at Secretary Clinton’s speech on internet freedom last week. The Secretary, to be sure, called China out for censoring the internet, but she couched that criticism in pretty cozy language:

The internet has already been a source of tremendous progress in China, and it is fabulous. There are so many people in China now online. But countries that restrict free access to information or violate the basic rights of internet users risk walling themselves off from the progress of the next century. Now, the United States and China have different views on this issue, and we intend to address those differences candidly and consistently in the context of our positive, cooperative, and comprehensive relationship.

Ma Zhaoxu, a spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry, was less friendly in his response:

The US attacks China’s internet policy, indicating that China has been restricting internet freedom. We resolutely oppose such remarks and practices that contravene facts and undermine China-US relations.

China’s internet is open. China is a country with the most vibrant internet development. By the end of last year, China had 384 million internet users, 3.68 million websites and 180 million blogs. China’s Constitution guarantees people’s freedom of speech. It is China’s consistent policy to promote the development of internet. China has its own national conditions and cultural traditions. It supervises internet according to law, which is in parallel with the international paractice…

We urge the US to respect facts and stop attacking China under the excuse of the so-called freedom of internet.

Once we’re past the PRC’s spurious claims about how free their internet is, we can see this in the context of a much bigger picture. Much like our ongoing spats over Tibet, Taiwan and human rights, the Chinese see internet policy as a purely domestic matter, and take criticism of their policy as an affront to their sovereignty. Given our persistent failure to affect China’s behavior on any other sovereignty issues, we’re likely to continue receving nothing but hostility when we bring up internet freedom.

But China’s trucluence shouldn’t be taken as a reason to shut up about internet freedom and censorship. As the Secretary made clear in her speech, freedom of information is at the heart of both our economic prosperity and our national security. Deeper than that, freedom of information is– in itself– a core value of American society.

The progress of freedom around the world has been swamped because developing countries see China as a living example that economic success can be achieved without relaxing the grip of authoritarian rule. For the first time in decades, perhaps centuries, freedom is in retreat around the world. Now more than ever, America must stand as a beacon of liberalism and an exemplar of the power of openness.

We may not get the needle to move on censorship in China, but we must be vocal in support of information freedom– an unambiguous good– and in our criticism of those who stifle liberty anywhere on the globe.