<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Policy Institute &#187; Kashmir</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newpolicyinstitute.org/tag/kashmir/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newpolicyinstitute.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:14:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>India Bans Pre-Paid Mobiles in Kashmir &#8211; Security or Suppression?</title>
		<link>http://www.newpolicyinstitute.org/2009/11/india-bans-pre-paid-mobiles-in-kashmir-security-or-suppression/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newpolicyinstitute.org/2009/11/india-bans-pre-paid-mobiles-in-kashmir-security-or-suppression/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam duPont</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kashmir]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newpolicyinstitute.org/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For eight years, the Indian government dragged its feet until, in 2003, it finally permitted mobile phones in conflict-torn Kashmir. Intelligence officials had feared that Kashmiri and Pakistani militants would use the phones to plan attacks on Indian army outposts throughout the region, but in &#8216;03 they relaxed the ban, and the past six years [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For eight years, the Indian government dragged its feet until, in 2003, it finally permitted mobile phones in conflict-torn Kashmir. Intelligence officials had feared that Kashmiri and Pakistani militants would use the phones to plan attacks on Indian army outposts throughout the region, but in &#8216;03 they relaxed the ban, and the past six years have been the most peaceful since the conflict began in 1989. Causation? Probably not. But correlation, anyway.</p>
<p><img style="float: left; margin-top: 3px; margin-bottom: 3px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; border: 2px solid black;" src="http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/assets/images/2009/08/27/090827150256_6masks.jpg" alt="Srinagar Cell Phone" width="251" height="141" />Last week, the Indian government walked back on technological freedoms in Kashmir, <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2009/11/03/will-ban-on-pre-paid-mobile-connections-further-alienate-kashmiris/comment-page-3/#comments" target="_blank">banning pre-paid mobile connections</a>. In Kashmir, as in much of the developing world, pre-paid is a popular option thanks to its known costs, and low commitment; the new ban will take phones out of the hands of 3.8 million Kashmiris. Unsurprisingly, hundreds of Kashmiris have taken to the streets of Srinagar, the capital city, to <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5heWO8mVkFq4ou-VIi_MfFD8TNNlw" target="_blank">protest</a> the law in recent days.</p>
<p>The stated reasons for the prohibition are that mobile vendors are not conducting proper background checks on new subscribers, and that militants are using mobile phones to detonate bombs&#8211; a practice observed in Iraq and Afghanistan in recent years. I suspect the actual reasons are considerably more Machiavellian.</p>
<p>Srinagar is one of the most heavily-militarized cities in the world, and the dense presence of Indian troops has led to frequent clashes between Kashmiri civilians and the military. As the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/documentaries/2009/08/090827_world_stories_new_media_kashmir.shtml" target="_blank">BBC documented earlier this year</a>, young Kashmiris have been using their cell phones to bear witness to the disproportionate, often unprovoked violence of the Indian army. With a camera phone in every hand, every citizen is a journalist, and the explosion of photos, videos and other first-hand accounts of the violence in Kashmir has brought images of the violence to the world.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, the Indian intelligence services have met with some success finding and killing militants by monitoring the cell phone conversations of Kashmiris. The consistency and higher background-check requirements for post-paid cell phone plans makes it much easier to monitor those subscribers.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s my strong suspicion that the pre-paid ban in Kashmir has more to do with suppressing critical citizen media and monitoring civilian phone conversations than it does with preventing phone-bomb attacks. The ban consists of a suppression of basic freedoms and a violation of privacy in an already repressed state. Further, the government is denying citizens a valuable tool for economic development and access to the global ICT network&#8211; increasingly a fundamental right in itself.</p>
<p><em>FD: I spent some time reporting in Kashmir. My views are certainly informed by that experience. <a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1252/is_10_135/ai_n31010232/?tag=content;col1" target="_blank">My reporting is published here</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newpolicyinstitute.org/2009/11/india-bans-pre-paid-mobiles-in-kashmir-security-or-suppression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
